Assignment: Mary Grace Natividad S. Poe-Llamanzares v. COMELEC, G. R. Nos. 221697 & 221698-700, March 8, 2016

Facts:
Mary Grace Natividad Sonora Poe-Llamanzares was found abandoned as an infant in a church in Jaro, Iloilo. She was later adopted by celebrity couple Fernando Poe, Jr. and Susan Roces. Upon reaching her 18th birthday, she registered as a voter. After initially studying in a local university, she continued her studies in the United States. After graduating from college, she got married and stayed in the United States to be with her husband. There, she became a mother to 3 children and acquired a US citizenship.

She returned to the Philippines to take care of his father - who eventually died. After much thought and discussion with her husband, they decided to go back to the Philippines to be close to her mother. She regained her Filipino citizenship by 2006. She served in government as Chairperson of the MTRCB. By 2011, she renounced her US citizenship. She ran and won as Senator in the 2013 elections, wherein her period of residence was 6 years and 6 months.

She decided to run for the presidency for the 2016 elections and filed her candidacy at the COMELEC. Her residence in the Philippines would 10 years and 11 months a day before the 09 May 2016 election day. A petitioner filed a petition to deny her candidacy on the following grounds:
(i) Grace Poe is not a natural born Filipino citizen being a foundling.
(ii) Grace Poe fall short of the 10-year residency requirement.

Grace Poe filed her response to the petitioner's complaints:
(i) COMELEC is not the appropriate court to determine her citizenship but the Department of Justice.
(ii) The petitioner failed to show proof(s) that Grace Poe is not natural born Filipino citizen.
(iii) She did not make any misrepresentations to her certificate of candidancy (COC) with regards to her being a Filipino citizen and residency requirements.

On 01 December 2015, COMELEC Second Division issued its resolution stating that the COC of Grace Poe was cancelled. On 23 December 2015, Grace Poe filed for a motion for reconsideration but was denied.

She brought her case to the Supreme Court.

Issues:

1. Is COMELEC the appropriate body to determine her qualifications which include her citizenship?
2. Is Grace Poe a natural born Filipino?

Held:

COMELEC is not the appropriat body to determin her qualifications (including her citizenship) but the Presidential Electoral Board (PET) as mandated by Batas Pambansa Bilang 884.

Grace Poe is a natural born Filipino citizen. There is no provision against foundlings in the 1935, 1973 and 1987 Constitutions.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Case Digest for Article 91 of the Family Code: Munoz v. Ramirez and Carlos

FRANCISCO MUÑOZ, JR., Petitioner, v. ERLINDA RAMIREZ and ELISEO CARLOS, Respondents G.R. No. 156125, 25 August 2010 FACTS: The residential lot in the subject property was registered in the name of Erlinda Ramirez, married to Eliseo Carlos (respondents). On 6 April 1989, Eliseo, a Bureau of Internal Revenue employee, mortgaged said lot, with Erlinda’s consent, to the GSIS to secure a P136,500.00 housing loan, payable within twenty (20) years, through monthly salary deductions of P1,687.66. The respondents then constructed a thirty-six (36)-square meter, two-story residential house on the lot. On 14 July 1993, the title to the subject property was transferred to the petitioner by virtue of a Deed of Absolute Sale, dated 30 April 1992, executed by Erlinda, for herself and as attorney-in-fact of Eliseo, for a stated consideration of P602,000.00. On 24 September 1993, the respondents filed a complaint with the RTC for the nullification of the deed of absolute sa...
Read more

Case Digest: In the Matter of the IBP Membership Dues Delinquency of Atty. Marcial A. Edilion | A.M. No. 1928, 3 August 1978

In the Matter of the IBP Membership Dues Delinquency of Atty. Marcial A. Edilion A.M. No. 1928, 3 August 1978 Facts:     The respondent is a duly licensed practicing Attorney in the Philippines. The IBP Board of Governors recommended to the Supreme Court the removal of the name of the respondent from its Roll of Attorneys for stubborn refusal to pay his membership dues assailing the provisions of the Rules of Court 139-A and the provisions of Paragraph 2, Section 24, Article III of the IBP By-Laws pertaining to the organization of the IBP, payment of membership fee and suspension for failure to pay the same.     Edilion contends that the stated provisions constitute an invasion of his constitutional rights in the sense that he is being compelled as a pre-condition to maintain his status as a lawyer in good standing to be a member of the IBP and to pay the corresponding dues and that as a consequence of this, compelled financial support of the said org...
Read more

Case Digest: Fidela Bengco and Teresita Bengco, Complainants, v. Atty. Pablo S. Bernardo, Respondent | A.C. No. 6368, 13 June 2012

Fidela Bengco and Teresita Bengco, Complainants, v. Atty. Pablo S. Bernardo, Respondent A.C. No. 6368, 13 June 2012 Facts:     Fidela Bengco and Teresita Bengco filed a complaint for disbarment against Atty. Pablo S. Bernardo for deceit, malpractice, conduct unbecoming a member of the Bar, and violation of duties and oath as a lawyer. From 15 April 1997 to 22 July 1997, the respondent – with the connivance of Andres Magat – willfully and illegally committed fraudulent act with intent to defraud against the complainants by using false pretenses and deceitful words to the effect that he would expedite the titling of land belonging to the Miranda Family of Tagaytay City, who are the acquaintance of the complainants.     It started when the respondent convinced the complainants to finance and deliver to him PhP 495,000.00 as advanced money to expedite the titling of the subject land. He further committed misrepresentation by presenting himself as the lawyer of ...
Read more